UN Mission: foreign support fuels Sudan war

The UN Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Sudan on Sept. 3 released a new report detailing how external support networks fuel the conflict and escalate civilian harm in the country. The Mission concluded that foreign-sourced weapons, drone systems, components and personnel have significantly expanded the military capabilities of both the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), intensifying the conflict's scale and lethality.

According to the report, the RSF and SAF have acquired sophisticated capabilities, including long-distance drones, through "externally sourced systems, components, personnel and munitions." The Mission stressed that international law applies not only to the parties directly engaged in hostilities but also to external actors that supply weapons, provide operational support, or facilitate mercenary activity.

The Mission notes that drone use has extended the geographical scope of the conflict and is damaging essential infrastructure, including electricity, fuel, water and transport systems, as well as health systems and public spaces such as schools and markets, displacement sites such as the Zam-Zam camp in Darfur, and places of worship. The report documents RSF drone attacks on the city of El-Obeid, a hospital and school in Kalogoi, and a displacement site in Kulba, impacting civilians "already affected by siege, isolation and restricted access to essential services."

The Mission determined these strikes violated Customary International Humanitarian Law (IHL), which prohibits attacks directed at civilian objects, requires verification that targets are military objectives, and mandates precautions to minimize civilian harm. Apparent SAF drone strikes on a hospital in Ad-Da'ein and strikes on markets in Abu Zaima and Yabus have caused casualties and disrupted commerce and essential services. The mission found that the hospital strike violated Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol II, which protect the sick and wounded.

Although the UN Security Council has long imposed an arms embargo on Sudan, the Mission believes the RSF sources artillery, air-defense systems, drones, and other military equipment from individuals and entities in the United Arab Emirates, Chad, Libya and Somalia. The report stated that arms suppliers who violate the embargo contribute to crimes under international law.

The Mission also estimated that as many as 2,000 foreign military personnel and contract agents, particularly from Colombia, have been involved in the fighting in Sudan. The UN Convention against Mercenaries and the African Union's Convention for the Elimination of Mercenarism require state parties to prohibit and suppress such activities.

While Chad, Colombia and the United Arab Emirates are cooperating with UN inquiries, the Mission emphasized the need for stronger international action to address the external support that risks further entrenching the conflict.

From JURIST, Sept. 4. Used with permission. Internal links added.

RSF leaders met with Israeli officials: report

Senior officials from Sudan's Rapid Support Forces (RSF) maintained secret contacts with Israel and sent delegations to Tel Aviv during the conflict, French investigative outlet Africa Intelligence reports.

According to the report, two delegations representing the RSF secretly traveled to Tel Aviv, the first in May 2025 and the second in February 2026. Members of the delegations are said to have met with officials from the Africa Division of Israel's Foreign Ministry and with Israeli intelligence personnel.

The first delegation reportedly included Abdel Rahim Hamdan Dagalo, deputy to RSF leader Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, known as Hemedti, as well as their brother, Algoney Hamdan Dagalo. The report claimed that the two returned to Israel in February 2026, and that the organization's legal adviser joined them during the second visit. (JP)

US blocks Sudan army chief from attending UNGA

The US government has been withholding a visa to Sudanese army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, preventing him from attending the UN General Assembly and sparking dispute among the countries attemptng to mediate an end to Sudan's war. The UN system treats al-Burhan as the de jure leader of Sudan, yet his presence at UNGA has been made contingent on agreeing to a 90-day ceasefire proposed by the US, which is part of the so-called Quad mediation group that also includes the UAE, Egypt and Saudi Arabia.

The army has repeatedly rebuffed truce proposals, yet the US pressure campaign is seen as coercive by the SAF and allied Quad countries, most notably Saudi Arabia, which has reportedly threatened to leave the grouping. The SAF views itself as a legitimate state authority battling a brutal paramilitary group—the Rapid Support Forces—and loathes being treated simply as a warring party. A US statement on Sept. 22 arguing that neither the SAF nor the RSF "represent legitimate, constitutional governance for Sudan" shows growing divergence. (TNH)

This may indicate a US tilt to the regional "axis of revisionists."