The interminable divide-and-rule game between Muslims and Jews worldwide goes on, with the latest maddening development in France. We noted last month [10] that a bomb attack on a kosher grocery store in a Paris suburb was met with equivocation by the authorities and media, with an unseemly reluctance to acknowledge the incident as anti-Semitic—and only right-wing Zionist commentators rose to the occasion of calling it out. (Except us, of course.) Now those same right-wing Zionist commentators—namely, Jewish Policy Center [11] on Oct. 19—weigh in on new developments in the case, as well as an anti-Semitic outburst in Malmo, Sweden. The statement ironically mimics the time-honored tactic of anti-Semites [12], of mixing up legitimate points with cynical shots, confusing the gullible. To wit:
For the 600 Jews of Malmo, living alongside 60,000 Muslims, Jewish life has been difficult for years, with harassment of individuals and vandalism of the cemetery and synagogue. What makes it harder is a city administration that believes the Jews are asking for it. In a 2010 interview, Mayor Ilmar Reepalu [13] told Skanska Dagbladet, [Jews] "have the possibility to affect the way they are seen by society," urging the community to "distance itself" from Israel. "Instead, the community chose to hold a pro-Israel demonstration," he said, adding that such a move "may convey the wrong message to others." He said, "There haven't been any attacks on Jewish people, and if Jews from the city want to move to Israel that is not a matter for Malmo."
Presented with information that Jews had, indeed, been attacked in Malmo, the mayor retreated [14] just a step and said, "We accept neither Zionism nor anti-Semitism or other forms of ethnic discrimination." Zionism thus defined becomes the reason people in Malmo attack Jews -- who should be distancing themselves from "ethnic discrimination" rather than supporting Israel, according to Repaalu.
This may be why the Jewish community in Malmo, not the government, pays nearly all the cost of its own protection. The Simon Weisenthal Center called it a "Jew tax." [15] Even then, according to the community president, Swedish authorities twice refused [15] permission to install security cameras outside the Jewish community building, home to a kindergarten, meeting rooms and Chabad apartments, because it is a "quiet street." After the latest brick and firebomb attack on the Jewish Center, police spokesman Anders Lindell told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency [16], "The suspects (two 18-year old men) never said or indicated they were perpetrating a hate crime." That was good enough for him, so he charged them simply as criminal vandals. Only after an angry international response, including from the U.S., were the charges upgraded.
France at first glance would seem different.
The French government responded quickly and firmly to an attack on a kosher market in Sarcelles, a Paris suburb, with raids [17] in Strasbourg, Paris, Nice and Cannes. President François Hollande said the government would introduce bills for stronger counter-terrorism measures, including allowing police to access Internet communications. He added that places of worship would receive increased surveillance and protection, "because secularism, one of France's fundamental principles, directs the state to protect all religions."
On the other hand, Hollande also visited the head of the French Muslim Council, to reassure [18] him there would be no "scapegoating" of the Muslim community. "French Muslims must not suffer from radical Islam. They are also victims," he said, channeling his predecessor. After a rabbi and two children were killed at a Jewish school in Toulouse in March, then-President Sarkozy announced that both Jewish and Muslim schools would receive protection, saying, "I have brought the Jewish and Muslim communities together to show that terrorism will not manage to break our nation's feeling of community… We must not cede to discrimination or vengeance [19]."
No one called for discrimination or vengeance against Muslims and there were no discernible acts of either. But last week's series of raids [20] by French police points to a broad and wide effort by Muslims across France to build a network, create an arsenal and attract recruits. At some point, the French government will have to acknowledge two things: that the purpose of this effort is to attack French Jews; and that there is no "Muslim community" that sits apart from its own radical elements. It is the sea in which the radicals swim – to paraphrase Mao – and it has a share of the responsibility.
Oy vey. Where to begin?
1. Mayor Reepalu's response was indeed abhorrent blame-the-victim crap. However, that doesn't mean that Jews "distancing themselves" from Israel isn't a good idea. The problem is, when a goy politician essentially demands it as a diktat, telling his Jewish constituents they have to buy peace by being "Good Jews," it is guaranteed to have precisely the opposite effect. To really be legitimate, such calls must come from within the Jewish community.
2. While applauding the raids following the Sarcelles attack, Jewish Policy Center fails to note that (according to the Oct. 6 New York Times [17] story they themselves link to!) one man was killed in one such raid in Strasbourg. The report says he fired at police when they "entered" his apartment. Whatever the facts may be, given the recent intifadas by North African immigrant youth [21] in French suburbs, heavy-handed raids could just be more fuel for the fire. And (as we keep pointing out) if repression is presented as protecting the Jews... it certainly isn't going to be good for the Jews. Jewish Policy Center should think twice before they take glee at police raids.
3. Ditto applauding police snooping on Internet communications and "increased surveillance." Jews have all the historical reason in the world to be wary of unleashing police states. How quickly we seem to forget, despite all the "Never Again" propaganda. Hatred of the Muslims seems to be blinding voices like Jewish Policy Center to the reality that the worst persecution of Jews has been at the hands of the state, not insurgent youth, and at the hands of Europeans (including Frenchmen [22]).
4. Most sickening of all is the assertion that "no one called for discrimination or vengeance against Muslims and there were no discernible acts of either." First of all, Jewish Policy Center's own enthusiasm for police raids and Internet surveillance comes damn close (at least) to being a call for discrimination. (The targeting of Muslim communities for surveillance and infiltration in New York City [23] has certainly been discriminatory, and raids against Muslims after the Toulouse terror [24] in March also seemed to be.) And glibly dismissing the threat of attacks on Muslims certainly seems ironic given this Oct. 22 report from Reuters [25]:
The French Muslim Council (CFCM) urged the government on Monday to ban a far-right group that occupied a mosque on Saturday and issued a "declaration of war" against what it called the Islamization of France.
CFCM President Mohammed Moussaoui said the Council also wanted better protection for mosques and Muslim cemeteries against racist attacks, which he said jumped sharply in 2011 and continued to rise this year.
Some 73 protesters from a movement called Identity Group seized a mosque in the western city of Poitiers on Saturday and unfurled a banner referring to Charles Martel's historic defeat of advancing Muslim troops there in 732.
They stayed for more than six hours before police ejected them.
In a video posted on its website, the movement issued what it called a "declaration of war" on multiculturalism. It also called for a referendum to block further immigration from outside Europe and further construction of mosques in France.
Ah, yes. The Charles Martel fetish [26], which was also exhibited by the charming Oslo bomber, Anders Behring Breivik. And as we pointed out [27] after his terror spree, his media manifesto displayed both enthusiasm for Zionism (for standing up to the Muslim menace) and anti-Semitism (those Jews are polluting Europe with their multi-cultural values). As we have had all too many opportunities to point out [28]: anti-Semitism and Islamophobia are genetically linked phenomena. Why doesn't anyone else seem to get it?
Even in Sweden [29], there have been disturbing signs of a violent anti-Semitic resurgence [30]—coming not from Muslim youth but a nativist neo-Nazi movement [31]. If there are some neo-Nazis who may embrace Islamism for standing up to the Jewish menace in the same way that Breivik embraced Zionism for standing up to the Islamic menace, this embrace is certain to be just as equivocal. It is in the interests of Jews and Muslims in Europe (and everywhere else) to reject such alliances with the right-wing backlash (whether in the form of the police state from "above" or neo-Nazi thuggery from "below") and make common cause with each other against the forces of cultural cleansing and xenophobia (of which anti-Semitism and Islamophobia are both but variants).
Which is why, by invoking the supposed Maoist tactics of radical Muslims in Europe and implicitly calling for collective targeting of the "Muslim community," the Jewish Policy Center has forfeited all right to protest Europe's anti-Semitic resurgence.
So we ask again [32]: Where are the legitimate progressive voices that are anti-Zionist and anti-fascist—meaning, intrinsically, genuinely opposed to anti-Semitism? For whom neither opposition to Zionism nor opposition to anti-Semitism is a mere afterthought or lip service?
