7-7 anomalies emerge
The conspiranoid site Prison Planet has picked up on a BBC Radio 5 report from the evening of July 7, the same day as the London attacks, in which Pete Power, a former Scotland Yard counter-terrorism official and now managing director of the private security firm Visor Consultants, states that his company was carrying out an exercise on how to manage multiple bomb attacks on the London Underground at the precise time that the real attacks happened. He declines to say who contracted his firm for this work, saying only that it was "a company," and that he can't mention its name for "obvious reasons."
POWER: At half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now.
HOST: To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the exercise?
POWER: Precisely, and it was about half past nine this morning, we planned this for a company and for obvious reasons I don't want to reveal their name but they're listening and they'll know it. And we had a room full of crisis managers for the first time they'd met and so within five minutes we made a pretty rapid decision that this is the real one and so we went through the correct drills of activating crisis management procedures to jump from slow time to quick time thinking and so on.
Of course, like all conspiranoiacs, Prison Planet cannot refrain from telling the readers what to think:
The exercise fulfils several different goals. It acts as a cover for the small compartamentalized government terrorists to carry out their operation without the larger security services becoming aware of what they're doing, and, more importantly, if they get caught during the attack or after with any incriminating evidence they can just claim that they were just taking part in the exercise.
This is precisely what happened on the morning of 9/11/2001. The CIA was conducting drills of flying hijacked planes into the WTC and Pentagon at 8:30 in the morning.
This last claim is not true. In fact, PP's own embedded link on the drills goes to its page delineating several Pentagon (not CIA) exercises scheduled for the morning of 9-11, including one (Vigilant Guardian) that concerned a multiple hijacking scenario—but none concerning "drills of flying hijacked planes into the WTC and Pentagon." The only one which came close to "drills of flying hijacked planes into the WTC and Pentagon" actually concerned such a scenario at the Chantilly, VA, offices of the DoD's National Reconnaissance Office (see WW4 REPORT #48).
Prison Planet has also posted a follow-up story on the automatic e-mail Visor is now sending out in response to queries on the matter (which we present here minus PP's distracting interjected commentary):
Thank you for your message. Given the volume of emails about events on 7 July and a commonly expressed misguided belief that our exercise revealed prescient behaviour, or was somehow a conspiracy (noting that several websites interpreted our work that day in an inaccurate / naive / ignorant / hostile manner) it has been decided to issue a single email response as follows.
It is confirmed that a short number of 'walk through' scenarios planed [sic] well in advance had commenced that morning for a private company in London (as part of a wider project that remains confidential) and that two scenarios related directly to terrorist bombs at the same time as the ones that actually detonated with such tragic results. One scenario in particular, was very similar to real time events.
However, anyone with knowledge about such ongoing threats to our capital city will be aware that (a) the emergency services have already practiced several of their own exercises based on bombs in the underground system (also reported by the main news channels) and (b) a few months ago the BBC broadcast a similar documentary on the same theme, although with much worse consequences [??]. It is hardly surprising therefore, that we chose a feasible scenario - but the timing and script was nonetheless, a little disconcerting.
In short, our exercise (which involved just a few people as crisis managers actually responding to a simulated series of activities involving, on paper, 1000 staff) quickly became the real thing and the players that morning responded very well indeed to the sudden reality of events.
Beyond this no further comment will be made and based on the extraordinary number of messages from ill informed people, no replies will henceforth be given to anyone unable to demonstrate a bona fide reason for asking (e.g. accredited journalist / academic).
The only other medium to pick up the story is Aljazeera.com (not to be confused with Aljazeera.net, webpage of the Qatar-based cable TV network, although the name was probably chosen precisely to cause confusion). Although Aljazeera.com refrains from interjecting commentary in the story, it waxes elequent about 7-7 "Conspiracy Theories" (by its own wording) elsewhere.
This anomaly certainly bears scrutiny, and the conspiranoiacs get credit for catching such anomalies and bringing them to light before they slip down the Orwellian memory hole. But they do the truth a big disservice through their sloppiness, treating conspiracies as a priori conclusions, and inability to simply let the facts speak for themselves. Prison Planet spells out how the 7-7 conspiracy supposedly worked in an article entitled "How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps":
1) Hire a Crisis Management firm to set up an exercise that parallels the terrorist attack you are going to carry out. Have them run the exercise at the precise locations and at the very same time as the attack. If at any stage of the attack your Arabs get caught, tell the police it was part of an exercise.
2) Hire four Arabs and tell them they're taking part in an important exercise to help defend London from terrorist attacks. Strap them with rucksacks filled with deadly explosives. Tell the Arabs the rucksacks are dummy explosives and wouldn't harm a fly.
3) Tell four Arabs to meet up at London Underground and disperse, each getting on a different train. Make sure Arabs meet in a location where you can get a good mug shot of them all on CCTV which you can later endlessly repeat to drooling masses on television.
Etc., etc. Will somebody please tell Prison Planet that Pakistanis are not Arabs?
See our last post on the London attacks.
Homegrown terror network, or international plot?
From a July 12 Radio Free Europe report on the first arrest in the case:
Pakistan claims al-Qaeda link
From China Radio International:
Arrests in Pakistan
From the Mirror, July 16:
The ID anomaly
Conspiranoiacs are also jumping all over claims that the bodies of the attackers were conveniently found with lots of ID. E.g.:
Police found plenty of identification, including drivers' licences and bank cards, on the four men's bodies.
"They wanted people to know who they were," a security source told the Evening Standard. "They wanted to be martyrs." (Globe & Mail, July 14)
This is drawing obvious analogies to the seeming anomaly of a hijacker's passport surviving the WTC disaster and being found by the FBI in the rubble. E.g.:
Personal documents of all of them found at the scenes framing the patsies, just like paper passports of the hijackers found on 9/11. (Prison Planet)
Well, we agree—it is weird. But once again, why do the conspiranoiacs always have to overstate the case? PP uses the plural ("passports"), but only one supposed hijacker passport was found in the WTC rubble. It belonged to Satam al-Suqami, and confusion about more than one found passport stems from early erroneous accounts that it was Mohammed Atta's passport that was found. (Wikipedia)
Numerous conspiranoid sites (Newsrake, Rense, KurtNimmo) seem not to have got the word that these early accounts were wrong, and happily go on assuming that both al-Suqami's and Atta's were found.
People who take such dogmatic stances shouldn't play so fast and loose with the facts.
More houses raided
From Bloomberg, July 14:
British police today raided an eighth home in England as they expanded their investigation of last week's London subway and bus bombings, attacks that may have been carried out by U.K.-born Muslims as young as 18.
The house in Lodge Lane in the Beeston area of Leeds, in northern England, was being searched by officers from London's Metropolitan Police, said a West Yorkshire Police spokeswoman in a telephone interview. A house in Aylesbury, northwest of London, was still being searched today after officers raided the building late yesterday, police said. The searches began with raids on six other homes in the Leeds area two days ago.
While authorities haven't named their four suspects, U.K. news organizations including the BBC have, describing them as 18 to 30 years old and from West Yorkshire. A fifth man, possibly the mastermind, is being sought, the BBC said. Police said they couldn't rule out more attacks from people tied to the bombers.
Once again, residents were evacuated from the "cordon zone" around the house, although further details weren't available. Pretty scary how fast Leeds is starting to look like Palestine.
The suspects
Prison Planet is among those examining the information now available on the four suspects and determining: "As we predicted, the so-called suicide bombers are ordinary people who would have nothing to gain and everything to lose from blowing themselves up. We have a frame-up in action." (Does anyone ever have anything "to gain" from suicide bombings? Other than a ticket to paradise?)
Actually the results are rather a mixed bag. According to Newsday's profile today (July 14), assembled from wire reports:
Mohammed Sidique Khan, 30, spent "more time in the gym than the mosque" and his friends said "he never talked with them about religion."
Ejaz Fiaz, early 30s, "had recently dyed his hair blond and shaved the beard he'd proudly grown as a mark of a devout Muslim."
Hasib Mir Hussain, 19, had long hair and blue contact lenses, and was "a charmer who liked to flirt," but "turned very religious two years ago."
Shahzad Tanweer, 22, was "quiet" and "religious" and travelled to Pakistan this year to study Islam.
The accounts of un-Islamic behavior are drawing analogies to the 9-11 hijackers' partying on the eve of their attacks. From PP's "How the Government Stages the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps":
6) 4th Arab goes out partying in London night before and ends up getting out of bed late. No worries, the 9/11 'hijackers' did the same thing but that didn't cause us a big problem.
No source or link is provided for the claim that the "4th Arab" partied on the eve of the attack. (And, as we've pointed out, none of the London suspects were Arabs.) And claims (e.g. on 9-11Research) about the 9-11 hijackers' supposed drinking binge may be overstated. Wikipedia tells us the incident at the Hollywood, FLA, sports bar was a week before the attacks (not the "night before") and that Mohammed Atta, at least, was just drinking juice.
and...
Bill writes: "Will somebody please tell Prison Planet that Pakistanis are not Arabs?"
AND: will somebody please tell PP that neither Pakistanis nor Arabs are COMPLETE MORONS? "Hire four Arabs and tell them to strap 'fake' explosives to themselves" blah blah blah. Is this not an outrageously racist fantasy?
Who is the "fourth bomber"?
News accounts are divided as to whether the "fourth bomber" (how exactly were the numbers assigned?) was Elaj Fiaz (also rendered Nadim Fiaz and described by Leeds Today as a "schizophrenic Elvis Presley fan"), persumably a British-born Pakistani like the other three, or a Jamaican-born Briton named Lindsey Germail. (AFX News, July 14) Strangely, the media seem not to be noticing this anomaly in their own reporting.
Widow skeptical
The media seem now to be settling on Lindsey Germail/Jamal, 19, a Jamaican-born convert to Islam, as the "fourth bomber" (King's Cross). His pregnant widow, however, is refusing to believe it and demanding DNA evidence. From the Sun, July 16:
More on the bombs' military origin
London explosives have military origin
LONDON, July 13 (UPI) -- Scotland Yard has asked for European cooperation in finding how last week's London subway and bus bombers obtained military plastic explosives.
Traces of the explosive known as C4 were found at all four blast sites, and The Times of London said Scotland Yard considers it vital to determine if they were part of a terrorist stockpile.
C4 is manufactured mostly in the United States, and is more deadly and efficient than commercial varieties. It is easy to hide, stable, and is often missed by traditional bomb-sniffing detection systems, the newspaper said.
Forensic scientists told the newspaper the construction of the four devices detonated in London was very technically advanced, and unlike any instructions that can be found on the Internet.
The attacks in the morning rush-hour Thursday killed at least 52 people, and injured more than 700. At least four British bombers, three of Pakistani descent are among the dead.
Another man was arrested in West Yorkshire Tuesday, but no further details have been released.
London bombers used 'military' explosives
LONDON, July 12 (UPI) -- High-grade military explosives appear to have been used in the London bombings last Thursday, a senior French counter-terrorism officer has said.
"The nature of the explosives appears to be military, which is very worrying," said Superintendent Christophe Chaboud, the chief of the French anti-terrorist police, who was in London to assist Scotland Yard with the investigation.
Detectives have concluded that a single bomb maker built all four devices as similar components were found at all four blast sites, the Times of London reported Tuesday.
British intelligence officials have asked their European counterparts to check military stockpiles and commercial sites to determine is explosives are missing, European-based intelligence officials told the New York Times.
But one official said the only "concrete evidence" was that the explosives were not homemade. "We don't know if they are civil industrial or military industrial explosives."
Another flip-flop
The experts have changed their story again. Now we're back to the notion of simple homemade devices. From the Guardian:
Magdy El nashar militarywor
Magdy El nashar military
worked at egyptian military factories
this the truth
check BBC footage of his house
read title under his name if you can read arabic
It means little but...
why don't you provide a link, and translation of the title?
Timers or suicide?
Contradicting earlier reports (e.g. Reuters, July 9) that timers were used in the bombs, authorities are now saying the attacks were suicide bombings. A July 14 NBC report on this claim also notes:
British police are pursuing a fifth bombing suspect who may have masterminded the London attacks. According to an unidentified source quoted in The Times of London, detectives are looking for Magdy el-Nashar, 33, an Egyptian-born academic who recently taught chemistry at Leeds University. The newspaper said he was believed to have rented one of the homes being searched in Leeds.
This would appear to be the only Arab related to the case. Contrary to the ignorant assumption of Prison Planet, none of the alleged bombers were Arab.
El-Nashar arrested?
From the UK Telegraph:
Flashback to Madrid
Prison Planet also reminds us of a possible military connection to last year's Madrid attacks, reprinting this story from the London Times:
On the whole, your don't have a leg to stand on
Although you are fair and correct in some of your criticism, you net effect is obscuring the truth. You ad hominem attach (conspiranoid) language places you in the same general category as Ann Coulter.
I understand why anyone can take exception to prisonplanet. But, have you had a chance the read the absolute crap in the 911 Commission Report. Who's side are you on?
I'm on the side of truth.
With a small t rather than a capital one.
It is you conspiranoids who share the Bush mentality: either we're with you or against you. It's OK for you to call everyone outside your own elite circle "sheep", but if your critics engage you in a little colorful invective we're with The Enemy. "Conspiranoid" is a reference to Richard Hofstadter's "The Paranoid Style in American Politics," a phenomenon which has hypertrophied since he wrote the essay in 1964.
Conspiranoiacs also invariably can't spell (I think you meant "attack," not "attach") or use correct grammar (questions generally end in question marks—or were you sleeping that day in second grade?)