Colombia bashes Nicaragua over FARC dialogue offer; Ortega bashes back
In a letter from chancellor Jaime Bermúdez, the Colombian government formally rejected Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega's offer to mediate in a peace process with the FARC guerillas. The letter also objected to Ortega's reference to the FARC as "brothers," calling it "offensive to the Colombian nation to grant this kind of treatment to...a terrorist group that commits crimes against humanity." (ANMCLA, July 20)
At a Managua celebration of the 29th anniversary of the Sandinsta revolution, Ortega shot back at Bogotá, asserting, "We do not have to ask anyone's permission to struggle for peace." He called the Colombian government "oligarchical" and a client of the US, and dismissed as "ridiculous" and "absurd" Colombia's assertion of sovereignty over Caribbean waters claimed by Nicaragua. (La Prensa, Nicaragua, July 20)
See our last posts on Nicaragua, Colombia and the maritime dispute.
Ortega fetes East German "Purple Witch" in Managua
Man, how depressing. These guys have learned absolutely nothing since the '80s, have they? From Der Spiegel, July 21:
Sandinista Leadership
Yes, Ortega is pretty hiddeous. However, why waste your time critizing a leader of a country that can barely feed its people due principally to U. S. intervention. Have you been to Nicaragua within the last few years? The U.S. destroyed the place. The East German "communists" were pussycats compared U.S. interventionists in Central America.
Because it's depressing...
...how little these guys have learned. And that includes Chávez, who shared the stage with this monster. Yeah, we all know about how US intervention destroyed Nicaragua, but these are supposed to be the good guys.
Ortega
There are no good guys, only differing levels of bad. However, men like Ortega, Chavez and Correa will not solve the problems because they are the problem. They are snakes that feed on the illiterate, poor and helpless while claiming to champion them.
Now they face the thing the fear the most: A successful democracy growing in spite of their efforts to maintain the status quo, In spite of their tacit and non-tacit support of failed revolutionaries.
There time will soon be done; I think Ortega and Correa will fade into history, failures that will be forgotten. As for the Chavez, I think his will be a lasting memory, maybe if we're lucky, hanging form a rope in Caracas
What would that "successful democracy" be?
Just wondering.