US aggression against Iran: one reader writes
Terrifying reports are mounting of imminent US aggression against Iran, and we have been hearing for months ominous rumblings that Israel will actually strike first. Our March issue featured an interview with Bina Darabzand, a leader of Iran's embattled left opposition which rejects both the Ahmadinejad regime and US aggression. Our March Exit Poll was: "Will the US or Israel bomb Iran first? (Or is it all going to blow over?)" To our disappointment, we received only one response:
From The Great Goldberg, somewhere in cyberspace:
IT WILL ALL BLOW OVER GOOD LUCK
WW4 REPORT responds: We sure hope so. And thanks, we need it.
See our last Exit Poll results.
Late-breaking response
From Robbie Liben in Missoula, Montana:
The Iran gambit could be a
The Iran gambit could be a cover for a partial invasion-occupation of the geographic region of Iran where in the words of the U.S. Department of Energy the "vast majority of Iran's crude oil reserves are located," that is, "in giant onshore fields in the southwestern Khuzestan region near the Iraqi border." Contrary to popular myth, this would not entail going "all the way to Tehran," as a saying attributed to the Neoconservatives has it, but only as far as the greatest concentration of Iran's proven oil reserves extend, where southeastern Iraq borders Khuzestan. See "Iran," U.S. Energy Information Administration, January, 2006, p. 2. As this same report adds, "in September 2005, several bombs were detonated near oil wells in Khuzestan, raising concerns about unrest amongst ethnic Arabs in the region"
Yes, we have noted...
...the Khuzestan angle. The Khuzestan Arabs seem to have good reason to be angry, and we can be sure the CIA is doing everything possilbe to enflame the situation.