WHY WE FIGHT
From Gothamist, Sept. 13:
No Charges For Running Over Schoolkids On Queens Sidewalk
The SUV driver who plowed into five teenagers on a Queens sidewalk yesterday morning has not been charged with any crime nor issued any summonses. This stands in stark contrast to another sidewalk collision yesterday: between a cyclist and Nicole Kidman in Manhattan. The crash in Queens resulted in very serious injuries; in Manhattan, Kidman was knocked down but unscathed. But in Kidman's case the cyclist was swiftly issued three summonses.An NYPD spokesman confirmed today that the driver in yesterday's crash, Francis-Aung Lu, had not been charged or issued any summonses, but the investigation is still ongoing. The teens survived the crash with various injuries—it appears Ashley Khan, 13, got the worst of it. DNAinfo reports that Khan suffered a compound fracture to her left leg and a broken pelvis when she was pinned under the SUV. Another girl's back was broken.
"We lifted the car just enough to get the girls out," David Foubister, 40, at truck driver who witnessed the crash,told DNAinfo. "It was a whole community effort. The girls were in shock." Marina Abadir's uncle told the Daily News, "They’re not really sure how many bones are fractured in her body,” said Sherif El Gawly, 37, her uncle. "Marina is able to move her arms and legs. She can’t move her neck. She’s wearing a neck brace.”
Councilmember Elizabeth Crowley defended the driver, telling the News, "He hit the gas instead of the brake. This had everything to do with being an accident."
Not to be outdone, the school's principal sent out a memo to parents reminding kids not to listen to headphones when walking around. Here's video of the "accident," which shows none of the teens listening to headphones:
Be sure to click on the link for the chilling video. Remember, this could be you the next time you step out on the sidewalk. More at Mobilizing the Region transportation blog.
See more reasons WHY WE FIGHT
Death in Queens sidewalk-jumping incident?
One of the three kids hit in the sidewalk-jumping incident in Maspeth has died, and Charles Komanoff of StreetsBlog is skeptical of official claims that the death is unrelated to getting hit by the car just days earlier. In another post, Komanoff issues a call to "Make the Maspeth Crash Horror a Teachable Moment for New York City." That would be nice, but it seems to us that New Yorkers are hopelessly inured to motorist violence, in a way that they never were to the violence of street crime. And we want to know: Why is that?
WHY WE FIGHT
From The Brooklyn Paper, Aug. 9:
Tearful City Council testimony on Sammy Cohen Eckstein
Amy Cohen, grieving mother of Sammy Cohen Eckstein, testified before New York's City Council today, unsuccessfully struggling to hold back tears as she urged a new law to cap speeds on the city's residential streets at 20 miles per hour, calling it "a no brainer." She added: "Every 33 hours, someone is dying. The next one could be someone you love."
Said her husband aid Gary Eckstein: "Just yesterday morning, Amy used a borrowed radar gun to clock the speed of vehicles traveling in front of our home on Prospect Park West where Sammy was killed. Although the bike lane and reduction to two lanes has slowed traffic somewhat (and you would think the large memorial to Sammy in the the intersection would make drivers aware of the need to drive slowly), in a span of approximately 15 minutes, 25 vehicles—many of them large commercial vehicles—exceeded the 30 mph limit."
Yet the local 78th Precinct issues not one speeding ticket last month. Which raises the question of why a 20-mph limit would be enforced if the 30-mph limit is not now being enforced.
The paradoxicallty named Committee for Taxi Safety opposes the bill. Vehicular deaths are said to be at their lowest levels since record-keeping began. But 237 people were killed in traffic incidents in 2011—yes, a 40% drop from 2001. Nontheless... "Death by traffic is the leading preventable cause of death for children under the age of 15," said Paul Steely White, director of Transportation Alternatives, who was also emotional in his City Council testimony. Even before Sammy's death, Cohen and Eckstein had been members of the group.
Coverage at Gothamist, Daily News, WNYC
WHY WE FIGHT
From the New York Times, Oct. 15:
WHY WE FIGHT
From the NY Times, Nov. 2:
An angry NYC bicyclist manifesto on Rebel Metropolis, "It's Time to Stop Sharing the Road," accurately notes: "The burden of mortality is always on the person riding a bike, yet the burden of responsibility for using a car to kill or maim a person virtually never falls on the driver."
Charges in NYC car-nage... for a change
Well, whaddaya know? From the NY Times, Nov. 3:
Victim charged in police shooting
This takes the damn cake. The NY Times reports Dec. 4: "An unarmed, emotionally disturbed man shot at by the police as he was lurching around traffic near Times Square in September has been charged with assault, on the theory that he was responsible for bullet wounds suffered by two bystanders, according to an indictment unsealed in State Supreme Court in Manhattan on Wednesday."
Reminds us of the Marikana massacre survivors in South Africa last year being charged with murder for the deaths of their own comrades by the police. It's the cops who should be in the dock! Needlessly firing in a jam-packed Times Square, and then charging some innocent loon who was dancing in traffic? Twisted totalitarian bullshit of the lowest order. What a blow it will be for mere elementary logic if these charges stick.
But more the point of this particular thread: Said loon, one Glenn Broadnax, 35, of Brooklyn, was (whether he realized it or not) reclaiming public space. It is his damn right to dance in the street! As a citizen, he owns those damn streets! Maybe Broadnax's little Times Square dance was a protest against the domination of public space by the tyranny of the automobile. Maybe he should launch a First Amendment defense.
We're serious.
WHY WE FIGHT
A 50-car pile-up in Pennsylvania today left one driver dead and dozens of motorists stranded on the state turnpike for hours in the middle of a major snowstorm. The mega-crash near Morgantown left motorists stranded on the road for hours as the snow continued to fall. Meanwhile a 30-car crash in Milwaukee caused multiple injuries. (ABC, Dec. 8)
License to kill
The beat goes on. From the NY Times, Jan. 11:
"Vision Zero" for NYC?
Mayor Bill de Blasio announced Jan. 15 that he will implement his "Vision Zero" plan to reduce pedestrian traffic fatalities in New York City by installing new cameras and issuing more tickets for speeding, among other measures. He spoke at a site in Queens where an eight-year-old boy was killed by a truck as he walked to school last month. (Capital New York, Jan. 15)
Police say Noshat Nahian was crossing the intersection of 61st Street and Northern Boulevard in Woodside at about 8 AM when a tractor-trailer making a left turn hit him. The boy was just a block away from his school, PS 152, when he was struck. He was taken to Elmhurst Hospital, where he was pronounced dead. The driver of the truck, Mauricio Osorio-Palominos, 51, was actually arrested and charged with aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle and operating a vehicle in violation of safety rules. (PIX11, Dec. 20) One wonders if he'd have been arrested at all if he hadn't been unlicensed.
It would be nice if de Blasio is really going to execute a serious crackdown on lawless motorists. But note that the automotive trasnport system necessitates expanding the surveillance state with more police cameras on the public streets... We don't need more cameras, we need less cars.... If "Vision Zero" refers to zero traffic fatalities, it can only be acheived through zero cars. We sure wish de Blasio would recognize that...
Justice for Cooper Stock —too little, too late
From DNA Info New York, May 29:
Vision Zero: empty promise?
Attorney Steve Vaccaro writes for StreetsBlog NYC, Sept. 9:
NY cops beat elderly man bloody for jay-walking
From the NY Post, Jan. 19:
Then the cops physically held him while starting to write a ticket, and the still-uncomprehending man tried to wrench himself free. The cops reacted predictably.
How much longer are we going to tolerate this tyranny?
Oh, wait. This isn't tyranny. It's normality. Silly me.
WHY WE FIGHT
From The Villager, Feb. 13:
And what exactly was it that was worth all this carnage? Oh right, being a privileged anti-social idiot with a complete sense of entitlement:
Another case soon to be utterly forgotten by all but the survivors and the kin of the deceased...
Jaywalking: a human right
A couple of years ago we noted an interesting historical primer on the "Invention of Jaywalking." Now a BBC News analysis, "Jaywalking: How the car industry outlawed crossing the road," provides further enlightenment...
Another example of China following the bad example of the US. Exactly the opposite of what needs to happen...
More context on the invention of 'jay-walking'
Another piece looking at this forgotten history is provided by Joseph Stromberg on Vox Jan. 15, with amazing period photos of New York's vibrant streets in the pre-auto age. His sub-hed: "It's strange to imagine now, but prior to the 1920s, city streets looked dramatically different than they do today. They were considered to be a public space: a place for pedestrians, pushcart vendors, horse-drawn vehicles, streetcars, and children at play. As cars began to spread widely during the 1920s, the consequence of this was predictable: death."
More context on the invention of 'jay-walking'
An Aug. 4 piece on Gothamist quotes from a new study entitled Street Rivals: Jaywalking and the Invention of the Motor Age Street:
The story notes that a "counter-campaign using the term 'jay drivers' did not catch on." Maybe it's time to revive it.
More context on the invention of 'jay-walking'
A very refreshing open defense of jay-walking from Ravi Mangla in Salon Aug. 20: The secret history of jaywalking: The disturbing reason it was outlawed — and why we should lift the ban...
This all didn't just happen "naturally," folks...
Jaywalking while Black
A July 3 New York Times op-ed by Jane Coaston notes: "African-Americans are disproportionately arrested for jaywalking and other small-scale offenses nationwide." We're shocked.
License to kill
WNYC runs a heart-wrenching account of the case of Allison Liao, 3, who was killed by an SUV while crossing Main Street in Flushing with her grandmother on Oct. 7, 2013—one of the 156 pedestrians killed in New York City traffic last year. Allison and her grandmother had the right of way. The driver faced no consequences. More at Streetsblog.
Demand justice for Allison Liao
An administrative law judge for the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles on Jan. 6 deferred a decision concerning the driver’s license of the motorist who killed three-year-old Allison Liao. "My entire family has been suffering heartbreaking pain," said the tot's grandmother Chin Hua, who stopped several times to compose herself as she described the crash via a translator. “It’s better to revoke the driver’s driver's license.” Motorist Ahmad Abu-Zayedeh declined to testify. (Streetsblog) The Liao family has an online petition demanding justice in the case. It reads:
So a driver's license is not a license to kill? Really?
Meanwhile, the NY Post reported Dec. 24 that a group of Brooklyn bus drivers staged a one-day strike to protest the arrest of a fellow driver, under a new "Vision Zero" law, for what the Post called a "fatal crash" (a 78-year-old man was run down in the crosswalk). It pains us to have be on the opposite side of striking workers, but the tyranny of lawless motorists in NYC demands urgent action. This carnage and impunity has been accepted as "normal" far too long.
NY bus driver arrested for maiming pedestrian
The pedestrian was a 15-year-old girl, Jiahuan Xu, who was in the crosswalk and had the right of way on a Williamsburg street. She survived, but her leg has been so damaged that she may lose it. Yet the TWU Local 100 are protesting that the driver was arrested and charged with breaking the new "Vision Zero" law, that jacks up harming a pedestrian who has the right of way from a violation to a misdemeanor. The driver was not actually held, but given a desk appearance ticket. But Pete Donahue gripes in the Daily News: "Law-abiding MTA bus driver cuffed like thug after accident in Brooklyn." Excuse us? "Law-abiding"? The excuse for this is the notion that the driver "didn't see" Jiahuan.
To which we reply: Learn to see pedestrians, or get off the road.
License to kill
Another longtime Lower East Side fixture is gone. From the NY Post, March 27:
Note the usual jaundiced reporting. "No criminality is suspected." That inevitable, ironic line. She "wasn't paying attention." So she's to blame. The victim is always to blame. The driver "swerved," but doesn't say whether he hit the breaks. Generally, motorists will HIT THE GAS if they see a pedestrian in their way without the right of way, to terrorize 'em and teach 'em a lesson. Sure he "swerved"—at the last possible micro-second after first SPEEDING UP. In all probability.
When, when, when will New Yorkers rise up against this tyranny?
When?
Another innocent loon killed by morotist
From KPTV in Portland, Ore., May 4:
So taking a human life is OK, as long as you aren't stoned. Motorists have the right to be judge, jury and executioner if some harmless loon disregards social norms?
Where is the outrage?
Lawless motorist arrested.... Progress?
Glad to see him busted, but if he had a license and hadn't fled the scene, he probably would've got away with it. From WPIX, May 5:
Man-bites-dog incident fuels anti-bike backlash
From The Villager, May 12:
The case that sparked this bill is an example of "bad facts." I have ZERO sympathy for bicyclists who adopt the Social Darwinist mentality of motorists. But let's keep in mind that: a.) This is a man-bites-dog story. Bike-on-pedestrian collisions ironically get MORE play because they are far LESS frequent (as well as less likely to be deadly). b.) It is the dominance of cars that has turned the streets into a Darwinian death race, and encourages this kind of behavior.
And, by the way, there is a very good case for allowing bicycles to run red ligts, treating them essentially the way motorists (theoretically) treat stop signs. Idaho has already adopted this policy. There is a good piece exploring the question at Vox...
Man-bites-dog incident fuels anti-bike backlash —again
Jill Tarlov, a pedestrian struck by a cyclist in Central Park last week has died from her injuries, Gothamist reports. She was the second person in New York to be killed by a cyclist this year. The cyclist, Jason Marshall, was not arrested. Gothamist writes: "Marshall was reportedly riding his racing bike in the bike lane as he approached the intersection, and struck Tarlov after he swerved out of the bike lane to avoid several pedestrians. Some witnesses said he was speeding, which Marshall denies. He sustained minor injuries in the crash."
Now, Gothamist reported June 5 that a whopping 100 had been killed by cars in New York by that date. Yet cars are accepted as "normal," whereas bicycles are viewed as some abhorrant aberration and meance to pedestrians. We ask again: Why is that?
WHY WE FIGHT
From NBC New York, July 2:
"Slipped"? How does one "slip" under a truck? Sounds more like she was reaching under the truck, and the driver reacted like a typical conditioned motorist, and pulled out at that moment just to terrorize her. No charges have been filed (of course), and the Sanitation Department wouldn't talk to reporters.
WHY WE FIGHT
The double-decker tour bus driver who slammed into another bus and injured 14 people in Times Square on Aug. 5 while allegedly high on drugs has had his driver's license and vehicle registration suspended a combined 20 times, officials said. (NYP)
WHY WE FIGHT
From CBS New York, Aug. 11:
WHY WE FIGHT
From AP, Sept. 28:
War on bicycles excised from coverage of NYC car-nage
Big ups to WNYC for running this compelling account of the family of Queens rapper Asif Rahman, struggling with his senseless death, but nowhere does it mention the rather critical fact that he was riding a bicycle when he was run down by a truck four years ago... See the page on the incident at Ghost Bikes...
In an advance for Mayor Bill de Blasio's "Vision Zero" program, the NY City Counicl voted to lower the speed limit on streets (other than highways and parkways) from 30 to 25 mph. (Daily News, Oct. 7) Like 100 SUVs at the bottom of the East River, we'd call this... a good start.
WHY WE FIGHT
From The Villager, Oct. 16:
WHY WE FIGHT
Edgar Torres of Queens had the right of way Oct. 30—walking in a crosswalk, with a green light—when he became the fourth pedestrian to be fatally struck by an MTA bus driver in the last two months. The "accident" (sic) occurred at the same intersection in Ridgewood where a city bus driver killed pedestrian Ella Bandes in 2013. (StreetsBlog, Oct. 31)
WHY WE FIGHT
From a Nov. 13 report in The Villager on NYC Councilmember Margaret Chin's call for a study on traffic fatalities along Canal Street:
Unfortunately, that same issue contained a letter protesting "Bike anarchy on the streets," by one Ned Sublette...
Sorry, Ned, but the bicycling "disaster" is not backed up by the facts. The problem is that the massive deaths caused by cars (209 in NYC so far this year, according to the Vision Zero website) are accepted as "normal," while the rare ones by bicycles are viewed as an insidious menace. We also refer you to ethicist Randy Cohen's excellent NY Times op-ed of Aug. 4, 2012, "If Kant Were a New York Cyclist," explaining why it is safer for all if cyclists are not bound by rules devised for motorists.
Unreported car-nage
I was hoping it would have got some media coverage by now, but it hasn't. On Nov. 6, I arrived at the corner of Bowery and Canal on my bicycle just after an elderly pedestrian was hit by a taxi. Saw the ambulence take away the victim. Saw the cops let the cabbie go after he protested "He didn't see me"! Not even "I didn't see him," but "he didn't see me"! Don't tell me a driver's license isn't a license to kill.
A bit later in the same area, a police van with loudspeakers was announcing de Bazio's new 25mph speed limit, which is a good thing but will NEVER acheieve "Vision Zero." The cops were saying, seemingly without intentional irony: "Please slow down and drive carefully unless a sign indicates otherwise." So there are some streets where it is OK to drive recklessly?
WHY WE FIGHT
The Villager on Nov. 25 reported on that week's "Bloody Monday," with a cyclist and a pedestrian killed within a three-hour span on the Lower East Side. The taxi-driver who hit the cyclist, Shan Zheng, 61, on Houston Street was given a breathalyzer test and released. The BMW driver who hit a 57-year-old man crossing Bowery on foot was going 62 mph and kept going for another block until striking a fire hydrant at Stanton St. The driver was charged with criminally negligent homicide. He had 17 prior suspensions on his record. Why was he still on the road?
That same issue featured a guest editorial by one Carl Rosenstein, rejecting Chin's call for a study as a stalling tactic, and calling for immediate action to reduce truck traffic in Lower Manhattan.
Lawless motorist convicted.... Progress?
The Daily News reported Feb. 19:
OK, a start. But we wonder if the irrelevant fact that Acevedo is an "ex-con" didn't sway the jury (as if the "respectable" never commit this kind of crime). Ditto the fact that one of the victims was pregnant... We also object to the loaded word "crash." A more appropriate choice might be "assault."
WHY WE FIGHT
A New Jersey Transit bus rear-ended a private bus carrying more than two dozen Canadian middle-school students in the Lincoln Tunnel June 10, leaving 31 people with minor injuries. (NBC New York)
On June 7, a five-year-old boy was hit by a car at a Brooklyn intersection near Prospect Park, mere feet from where 12-year-old Sammy Eckstein was killed in 2013. Roark Bennett , who apparently "ran out into the street against the light after straying from his family," was thrown two car lengths but suffered only minor injuries. "Cops said there was no criminality." (Daily News)
In a new study by Hunter College professors, students surveyed 50 randomly selected intersections in Manhattan, the Bronx, Brooklyn and Queens. Of 4,379 drivers observed approaching lights that had already turned full red, 8.7%—nearly 1 in 10— ran the light. The majority of those who did not stop (4.4% of the total) drove straight through the light; others (2.6%) turned illegally on red; still others (1.7%) paused then continued through the red, treating it essentially as a stop sign. The observers only counted cars that entered the intersection after the light had already turned red. (CityLab, June 8)
More quotidian car-nage
A bicyclist was killed and three other people injured in what WABC is calling a "crash" this morning near the Barclays Center in downtown Brooklyn. Details:
Do we ever hate that bogus word "crash," which implies two objects of similar bulk accidentally hitting each other. This wasn't a "crash," this was a hapless bicyclist being mowed down by an SUV.
Another one from today's Daily News:
So the "crash" (as if it were just an inevitable accident) "occurred" (as if it were a random act of God, like someone getting struck by lightning).
WHEN WILL THIS CHANGE? WHEN, LORD, WHEN?
No, no, no! 'Crash' is too weak!
Well, this is ironic. Earlier this evening, I was at the Union Square vigil organized by Families for Safe Streets, which was moving and inspiring. Survivors and kin of motorist victims gathered with photos and memories of their lost loved ones (including many mentioned in the above thread). Several City Council members were on hand, and helped read out the names of hundreds of New Yorkers killed by reckless motorists. But... the slogan of the affair was Crash Not Accident, and an initiative has been launched to get the news media to phase out the word "accident" in favor of "crash." This, one day after my rant (see above) against the word "crash"!
I must dissent from this. "Crash" is admittedly a better word than "accident"—but still way off base. Again: "crash" implies two objects of similar bulk accidentally hitting each other. It is an utterly inappropriate word to describe a pedestrian or bicyclist being hit by a motorist. Think about it. The word "crash" obviously has its origin as an onomatopoeia—that's more or less the sound of two metallic objects of similar bulk hitting each other. The sound of a human being run over by a large, heavy metallic object moving at great speed is another word with roots as an onomatopoeia—squash!
Better to dispense with nouns and use the active voice: A pedestrian was run over. A bicyclist was mowed down. Or better: A pedestrian (or bicyclist) was killed (or gravely injured)... If you must use a noun... How about "assault"?
We applaud this campaign for starting a sorely needed conversation. But their terminology remains far too forgiving. And we reiterate: it is sheer delusion to think Vision Zero will ever be attained as long as there are cars on the streets of New York.
Abolitionism is the only intellectually consistent stance. Ban cars.
Establishment embraces critique of 'accident' terminology
Thus notes the New York Times, in a story entitled "It’s No Accident: Advocates Want to Speak of Car 'Crashes' Instead." Mark Rosekind, head of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, is quoted as saying: "When you use the word 'accident,' it's like, ‘God made it happen. In our society, language can be everything." OK, it's good that we're finally having this conversation, but (as noted above) the word "crash" is little better than "accident"....
Queens street to be named after Allison Liao
Queens Courier reports that the corner of Main Street and Cherry Avenue in Flushing will be known as Allison Hope Liao Way after Allison Liao, the 3-year-old girl who was fatally run down by a motorist on Oct. 13, 2013, while crossing the street with her grandmother. (Her kin are among the founders of Families for Safe Streets, cited above.) Alas, the Courier account commits the sematic sins that implicitly legitimize this kind of carnage. Allison Liao was not (as the photo caption has it) an "accident" victim. Nor (as the headline has it) a "crash" victim. Call it what it is: deadly assault, normalized under a political system in which motorists have a de facto license to kill.
Furthermore...
We object to the Queens Courier's use of the word "tragedy" to describe Allison's death. A tragedy is an act of God. This wasn't a tragedy, it was a crime.
A little justice for Allison Liao
From Streestblog, Oct. 29:
Cyclist documents NYC motorist transgressions
WNYC on Nov. 6 profiled Paul Vogel, a Brooklyn-based cyclist who takes photos through a small camera mounted on the front of his bike as he pedals around the city, documenting the blocking of bike lanes and other reckless and illegal motorist behavior.
Very good to see his efforts getting some play.
Crew looks for hazards in NYC bike lanes
PIX11 features the efforts of the Public Space Party ato document obstacles in the bike lanes of New York City. Benjamin Shepard puts on an orange jumpsuit and hard hat for organized bike rides. Crew members write "tickets" to cars that block the lanes and move items out of the way (including a dumpster).