Here we go again. Omar Mateen, named as the shooter in the Orlando massacre of at least 50 at a gay nightclub, is said to have made a 911 call before the attack, in which he pledged allegiance to ISIS and invoked the Boston Marathon bombers. (CNN [10]) Amaq News Agency, the ISIS media arm [11], issued a statement saying the attack "was carried out by an Islamic State fighter." (Heavy [12]) The ISIS statement is doubtless mere opportunism, simply claiming Mateen because he had declared for them, thereby becoming a one-man franchise. But there's more. A bizarre Washington Post [13] story tells us that Mateen's father is a vocal supporter of the Taliban and "appears to be portraying himself as the president of Afghanistan"...
Seddique Mateen, who has been referred to as Mir Seddique in early news reports, hosted the "Durand Jirga Show" on a channel called Payam-e-Afghan, which broadcasts from California. In it, the elder Mateen speaks in the Dari language on a variety of political subjects. He doesn't always make much sense. Dozens of videos are posted on a channel [14] under Seddique Mateen's name on YouTube. A phone number and post office box that are displayed on the show were traced back to the Mateen home in Florida. Mateen also owns a nonprofit organization under the name Durand Jirga...
In one video [15], Mateen expresses gratitude toward the Afghan Taliban, while denouncing the Pakistani government.
"Our brothers in Waziristan, our warrior brothers in [the] Taliban movement and national Afghan Taliban are rising up," he said. "Inshallah the Durand Line issue will be solved soon."
The Durand Line [16] is the demarcation established in 1893, in the aftermath of the Second Anglo-Afghan War [17], which now forms the Afghan-Pakistan border and bisects the Pashtun homeland. The Post says it is not clear whether the Mateens are Pashtun, but notes that most of the Taliban's followers are. (The younger Mateen, at least, was born in the US.)
Just hours before the Orlando shooting, Seddique Mateen posted a video on a Facebook page [18] called Provisional Government of Afghanistan — Seddique Mateen. In it, he seems to be pretending to be Afghanistan's president, and orders the arrest of an array of Afghan political figures.
"I order national army, national police and intelligence department to immediately imprison Karzai, Ashraf Ghani, Zalmay Khalilzad, Atmar, and Sayyaf. They are against our countrymen, and against our homeland," he says, while dressed in army fatigues.
That is pretty fringe stuff. With perverse irony, this same senior Mateen is now giving us the not-about-Islam line. From Reuters [19]: "Mateen's father, Mir Seddique, told NBC News the massacre was not related to religion. He said his son turned angry when he saw two men kissing in Miami a couple of months ago." This from the guy who supports the movement that stones gays to death in the name of Islam [20].
As with last year's San Bernardino massacre [21], the propaganda vultures are already descending on Orlando. Another WaPo story [22], "After Orlando, the right points to radical Islam, while the left points to guns, hate," depressingly states: "Those on the right were quick to blame radical Islamist terrorism. Meanwhile, those on the left were more apt to a frame this as a hate crime against gay people or to talk about Orlando in the context of mass shootings more broadly..." As if reactionary Islam and homophic hate were mutually exclusive theses.
A Fox News [23] headline predictably reads: "50 killed in shooting at Florida nightclub in possible act of Islamic terror." This will (rightly) win protests from Muslims, who will charge that terror is not Islamic. But a commentary on the UK's lefty Independent [24] warns of "The senselessness of blaming Islam for the LGBT shooting in Orlando." It states: "A lone gunman happened to be Muslim—but that does not mean an entire religion is to blame." No, the entire religion is not to blame. But nor is it merely coincidental that the gunman "happened to be Muslim." He was clearly motivated by his reactionary understanding of Islam. By all evidence, he was not a mere psychopath but a religious fanatic. The massacre was not "Islamic," but it was certainly Islamist. In denying this, the left is making the proverbial noose for its own neck. If we can't talk about Islamist terrorism, then we can't talk about Christian terrorism [21] either.
In the face of this horror, it will be grimly amusing to watch both left and right scramble. The lefties will (rightly) blame homophobia, while (dishonestly) avoiding the ideological context for this particular homophobia: political Islam. The right, meanwhile, will blame Islam in sweeping terms—while going to great contortions to avoid any mention of homophobia.
